They use conditional block floating point. Here comes what I don't understand: If a scaling is to be done after a butterfly it must also be done on all the other samples. Best regards, Matias. Thank you for a very thorough reply. I now have the Motorola DSP Post deleted by author. Hi Robert, must be very frustrating for you - really sorry.
Sign in Sign in Remember me Forgot username or password? Create account. Receive a notification when a new discussion is started in this forum DSPRelated. Are you looking for the older forums? About DSPRelated. Social Networks. The Related Media Group. Create free account Forgot password?
Contact An Expert. Get Support. Radix vs Radix-2 This core is designed around a Radix butterfly architecture. Device resources usage for IEEE implementation The following graph displays the signal-to-noise ratio of a Fast Fourier Transform performed over a 1, points random vector with a bit wide mantissa and 8-bit wide exponent.
Electronic warfare: an introduction to low latency COTS solutions. A guide to multi-channel synchronization for MIMO systems. Technologies for responding to rapid developments in cognitive RF and EW.
Addressing the challenges of low latency video system requirements for embedded applications. Brochures Innovation at Abaco. To see these results visually, an example point output is shown Fig. To get good results with such an input type requires both high dynamic range and high precision, a very important consideration for applications where small signals need to be seen in the presence of very large signals. Here the input is a single, full-scale real sinusoid.
And when coupled with significantly reduced design effort and design time, this can easily tip the scales in the direction of a floating-point implementation. No portion of this site may be copied, retransmitted, reposted, duplicated or otherwise used without the express written permission of Design And Reuse.
Design And Reuse. Fixed vs Floating-point During the course of an FFT computation it is well known that to avoid loss of dynamic range, numerical issues much be dealt with at each butterfly computation stage, leading to a variety of tradeoffs. Centar Fixed-point FFT The approach Centar uses for its fixed-point circuits is a very sophisticated block-like floating-point approach.
Centar Floating-point FFT Because Centar uses a scaling methodology that is already partly based on floating-point, extending it to full single-precision floating-point is relatively straightforward.
Table 2. Is there everything OK about that? But what about bit reversal? And both of them could be huge numbers like Am I wrong? And on the stage of testing the code it would be a night mare if I want for example change the resolution, buffer size or sample rate.
Your question title says: "Why it's not fast? As for the initialisation, the typical use case for FFTs is for a given N you apply many FFTs of the same size, so you just need to calculate one array of size N weights and re-use it many times. Add a comment.
Combining those optimization approaches result in approximately x speedup. Andrei R. Unfortunately title of my question is wrong. My point is not to optimize code, but to understand FFT calculations at all.
Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog.
0コメント