Cutting them, then, offers very little practical benefit. So, why are Trump and the G. They combine two of the G. Past research has also shown that the American public believes public media hogs a much larger share of the federal budget than it actually receives. The good news?
These cuts are, once again, very unlikely to materialize once the proposed budget jumps through all the requisite legislative hoops. Republicans have been playing this losing game for several decades; continuing the game at this point just means expelling more rhetorical hot air.
Plus Satellite radio. Why are we paying for this big-government, Democrat Party propaganda operation. But public broadcasting has enjoyed broad support among lawmakers, who often turn to their local outlets for appearances on public affairs programming.
Public media advocates also have been successful at mobilizing viewers to contact members of Congress when it looks like their funding is threatened. Prefer a once-a-week email? APA Benton, J. The latest from Nieman Lab. Public access television channels are an untapped resource for building local journalism.
Antoine Haywood. Are people lying more since the rise of social media and smartphones? David Markowitz. Sarah Scire. Conflict vs. Shraddha Chakradhar. Hanaa' Tameez. Join the 60, who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Public access television channels are an untapped resource for building local journalism Instead of letting public access channels wither due to commercial market fluctuations, we should publicly fund and expand the precious communication infrastructure that access media offers.
A seminal study was among the first to investigate the connection between deception rates and technology. Over in Blighty, the news prompted a more confused reaction. What the dickens is PBS? Is it the same as the BBC? Well, yes and no.
0コメント