The sampling rate does set an upper limit on the frequencies that can be recorded and played back, but that "limit" is not equal to the sampling rate. Once you get a grasp of what sampling rates mean, then it's time to move on to resolution depth. Once you understand how conventional linear PCM encoding works, then and only then should you tackle 5. Last edited by Lotus 7; 15th May at PM..
See where you stand then. Evaluate your equipment. Does it need to take ultra sonic information into consideration? The highest frequency you will capture with 96K is 48kHz. Does your equipment have this kind of resolution? Does your application require you to capture the highest amount of detail from this equipment?
Are you just curious about the sound of each sample rate? Each converter will sound different at each sampling rate. They end up recording more problems and noise. Some converters sound enhanced and higher fidelity when switched to higher rates. Some converters do not change at all when using different sample rates. Because Each Converter does it differently. A good one sounds great at I personally found However, there are times where the extra information flatters the players and enhances the response of the rest of my analog equipment.
Your experience may be different. So why don't you provide a valuable post? The purpose of forums is to ask and answer. If you're against that then why are you even on a forum. Who made you the authority on which posts are deemed "valuable? I did give an answer. I'm sorry you don't approve. I'll try better next time, just for you. Share 15th May Show parent Paschalis I. Unless if you just want to increase your post count and your signature to get more sales. And really, someone does not need to have some kind of authority to understand that.
I am not here to argue and waste forum's space with this kind of posts, so I'll stop here. Unless if you want to increase your post count. I am not here to argue to waste forum's space so I'll stop here. The OP needs to download files that are both at The files are out there, just have to go look for them.
The OP asked where to find a shootout in the title of the post. I agree, the files are out there, like everything else. On the other hand, by looking at the amount of wrongly done or confusing shootouts floating around, it's not such a bad idea to ask for directions on this forum. It is primarily a marketing gimmick and a sales pitch. Some people prefer to work at 96k and swear they hear a difference and that certain plugins like reverb sound better etc.
You do get a latency benefit at 96k, but as far sound quality, that's marginal at best, non existent at worst, and the increased hassle for dealing with larger files and the finicky nature of certain software in working at 96k was not worth it for me and so I stopped using 96k a few years ago.
In your case, given your level of experience, it is highly unlikely you would hear a tangible difference even with the best of equipment. Yeah, heaven forbid he make a decision for himself rather than depend on other people's ears. The next time I'm thinking of replying to someone, I'll PM you first and ask your permission. Please accept my apology. Quote: Originally Posted by Paschalis I. And really, someone does not need to have some kind of authority to understand that You figured me out!
I'll post less for you. I am not here to argue and waste forum's space with this kind of posts Too late. I know that k is CD quality. What I meant and was implying sorry if I wasn't being clear is that CD players will often limit the top end of the resolution to 20 khz even though the audio above 20 khz can still supposedly affect the high end frequencies. Feb 5, 3, 0 Therefore, the higher the frequency the better. You chop off the overtones, the fundamental isn't as "true" of a sound.
Dec 4, 18, 1 0. Actually, 48, isn't even enough, you need at least 96, to really start modeling analog quality and warmth. Time to get rid of your speakers. Most new recordings are mastered at , these days. A 20,Hz tone sampled at 22,Hz will be distorted beyond recognition.
You will be getting barely one sample per vibration, meaning you'll basically be sampling it at the same place every time, even though it's actually vibrating up and down.
The resulting playback tone could acutally be LOWER than you could hear, because it would have no relation to the input tone. Even at 44,, you are only getting 2. Oct 13, 15, 1 Eat your own damn footwear. Cattlegod Diamond Member.
May 22, 8, 1 0. Mar 20, , 5, Antoneo Diamond Member. May 25, 3, 0 0. Doesn't the higher frequencies that are being sampled contribute to the overall "feeling" of the music that is being played?
I thought this was the idea of SACD? I could be wrong as I do not know much about this so please enlighten me as well. If I ate my shoe, it would be like eating a pancake. Yours on the other hand Apr 30, 1, 0 0.
I can hear a dog whistle. However, I can tell the difference between 48kHz and Oct 9, 35, 29 Bad answer, both mathmatically and musically. I end up posting about this about every six months. I hope you're in the mood for a read.
Anyone who has seen my previous posts knows I think CD's suck compared to original sounds for two reasons -- 16 bits just aren't enough, and the sampling rate 44 KHz is way too low. As the signal level gets lower, you have fewer bits to resolve the details of the sonic image, so the distortion rises as the level goes down.
Meanwhile, human beings tend to tolerate more distortion at higher levels and to be more sensitive to distortion at lower levels, because that is what happens with both your own ears and most real world sound generators like instruments, speakers and amps. In other words, when it's full bore blowing your own ears into distortion, it's as clean as it's going to get. In a moderately soft passage, where your ears are more sensitive to distortion, CD's are glad to give you lots more distortion.
It's like dot matrix lithography without enough dots per square inch the equivalent of frequency response or a good enough grey scale the equivalent of dynamic range. A young man can get off single handed if the image is up to Playboy centerfold standards , but IMHO, 16 bits x 44 KHz is the equivalent of crude newsprint.
If the system encoded the signal as bits per dB, the distortion would be constant. However, that is a much more difficult system to build. Furthermore, the current system is already in place, and it would still require more bits to achieve acceptable results.
This sampling rate was chosen based on Nyquist's theorem, which states that, to recover a given frequency, you must sample the information slightly more than twice the highest frequency. The problem is that Nyquist wasn't a musician.
As you get closer to the high end of the audio spectrum, this theorem is only valid for a single, steady state tone. In the end, However, if your audio is to be used in a video or delivered on a digital format, 48 kHz and its derivatives may provide the better option. Hey James CD market is still huge. Country music CD sales has not changed.
CDs are stating to come back to where sales were previously. Record labels require delivery at 96k 24bit. It is my understanding that an increased bit depth will increase the overhead but an increased sample rate will do no such thing. The increased bit depth increases the available dynamic range but an increased sample rate I have a good system and my wife swears that vinyl sounds way better than anything else.
Whilst theory dictates… my ears can hear the difference this time and not just by a small amount. They can actually introduce unintended distortion in the audible spectrum, and this is something that can be heard in listening tests. Testing raw loopback recording on a song close to -0dBFS in Audacity from I had to test this out myself to actually see the theory in action. I do mostly restorations of older recordings.
The draw software up samples it to 96k anyways for processing. I think the errors would be accumulated. My final output delivery is always a wave 48K 16 bit. Your email address will not be published. What Is the Difference Between Can You Hear the Difference Between Pros and Cons of Using a Last Thoughts on Spencer Lee. Of course you can hear the difference.
0コメント